Observons et parlons de tout ce qui concerne notre planète et son humanité... Du plus probable au plus improbable...
 
AccueilFAQRechercherS'enregistrerMembresGroupesConnexion

Partagez | 
 

 Conspirationniste 1 USA zéro - voyage sur la Lune

Voir le sujet précédent Voir le sujet suivant Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
gurth
100 message il n'y aurai pas de message..(jeux de mots)
avatar

Nombre de messages : 568
Localisation : Trois-Rivières Québec
Date d'inscription : 29/05/2006

02092009
MessageConspirationniste 1 USA zéro - voyage sur la Lune

Conspiracy Theorist Convinces Neil Armstrong Moon Landing Was Faked:

LEBANON, OHIO—Apollo 11 mission commander and famed astronaut Neil Armstrong shocked reporters at a press conference Monday, announcing he had been convinced that his historic first step on the moon was part of an elaborate hoax orchestrated by the United States government.
According to Armstrong, he was forced to reconsider every single detail of the monumental journey after watching a few persuasive YouTube videos, and reading several blog posts on conspiracy theorist Ralph Coleman's website, OmissionControl.org.
"It only took a few hastily written paragraphs published by this passionate denier of mankind's so-called 'greatest technological achievement' for me to realize I had been living a lie, " said a visibly emotional Armstrong, addressing reporters at his home. "It has become painfully clear to me that on July 20, 1969, the Lunar Module under the control of my crew did not in fact travel 250,000 miles over eight days, touch down on the moon, and perform various experiments, ushering in a new era for humanity. Instead, the entire thing was filmed on a soundstage, most likely in New Mexico."
"This is the only logical interpretation of the numerous inconsistencies in the grainy, 40-year-old footage," Armstrong added.
Enlarge Image
Amstrong was swayed by OmissionControl's use of bolding and capital letters to highlight NASA's many blatant fallacies.
Although Armstrong said he "could have sworn" he felt the effects of zero gravity while soaring out of the Earth's atmosphere and through space, he now believed his memory must be flawed. He also admitted feeling "ashamed" that he had failed to notice the rippling of the American flag he and Buzz Aldrin planted on the surface, blaming his lack of awareness on the bulkiness of the spacesuit and his excitement about traveling to the "moon."
"That rippling is not possible in the vacuum of space," Armstrong said. "It must have been the wind from an air-conditioning duct that I didn't recognize because you can't hear a damn thing inside those helmets."
"This is all just common sense, people," he added. "It's the moon. You can't land on the moon."
In a symbolic display of his newfound skepticism, Armstrong then grabbed a collection of moon rocks he had kept as souvenirs and dramatically dumped them into a trash can.
One of the main arguments posited on Coleman's website—that America could not, in 1969, have realistically possessed the technological capabilities needed to put a man on the moon—was reportedly one of the first things to cause the legendary astronaut a pang of doubt. Despite having spent thousands of hours training for the historic mission under the guidance of the world's top scientists, technicians, and pilots, Armstrong said he knew the conspiracy theories were true after learning that website author Coleman was "quite the engineering buff."
"Yes, at the time I thought those thousands of NASA employees were working round the clock for the same incredible goal, but if anyone would know what was really going on, it would be Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said of the 31-year-old part-time librarian's assistant. "He knows a lot more about faked moon landings than I ever could. He's been researching the subject on the Internet for years."
"Literally years," he added.
Addressing another inconsistency brought to light by OmissionControl, Armstrong explained he was probably so focused on piloting the lunar module that he failed to notice that one of the moon rocks visible in footage of the landing appears to have the letter 'C' stamped on it. An emotional Armstrong said that the only possible explanation for this detail was that the rock actually came from NASA's prop department.
"They forgot to turn it over," Armstrong said, removing his eyeglasses to wipe away tears. "Those lying bastards at NASA went through all the trouble to fake the moon landing, but they forgot to turn over one little prop rock. And now the whole damn thing's blowing up in their faces."
Although Armstrong initially questioned why the U.S. would attempt such an elaborate cover-up, he cited one overarching explanation provided by Coleman: that it was a ploy to defeat the Soviet Union and fulfill the Illuminati's plan to unify the world's banks and control the dissemination of information.
"Just ask Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said. "He'll answer any questions you have."
To conclude the press conference, Armstrong showed reporters footage of his first steps on the moon to demonstrate that the most daming evidence was "right under our noses." Speeding up the tape and replaying the graceful moonwalk several times in a row, Armstrong explained that the iconic images of humanity's triumphant dance with the cosmos was actually just a film of him walking backwards, slowed down, and played in reverse.
"What other explanation could there be?" Armstrong asked. "It's all right here. Everything is all right here if you'd just open your damn eyes and see!"
Added Armstrong, "I suppose it really was one small step for man, one giant lie for


http://www.theonion.com/content/news/conspiracy_theorist_convinces_neil

Désolé pour l'anglais mais en tant que moi parfaitement pas bilingue je comprend.... donc vous ne devriez pas à avoir trop de la difficulté à traduire Smile
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur

 Sujets similaires

-
» Playmobil Astronaute - Voyage sur la Lune / Collection Aventures de l'histoire - 2016
» Un matrimonio interplanetario
» Voyage privé vers la Lune - Private expedition to the Moon
» Vidéo de la lune et départ d'objets
» Les vols habités vers Mars et la Lune impossibles pour la Nasa ?
Partager cet article sur : Excite BookmarksDiggRedditDel.icio.usGoogleLiveSlashdotNetscapeTechnoratiStumbleUponNewsvineFurlYahooSmarking

Conspirationniste 1 USA zéro - voyage sur la Lune :: Commentaires

Salut,

Pour ceux qui l'avaient déjà lu, j'avais posté une réponse ce matin, mais après deux-trois petites recherches, je "change mon capot de bord"... Wink

Je ne connais pas beaucoup "The Onion", source de l'article, mais je sais que c'est un journal satirique.

"Les articles de The Onion commentent des évènements réels ou imaginaires. Il parodie les principales rubriques des journaux classiques comme les éditoriaux, les interviews de l'homme de la rue ou les cotations boursières." Source: Wikipedia

Si on comprend bien l'anglais, quand on lit bien le texte deux fois (ce que je n'avais pas bien fait ce matin!!), on relève bien toute l'ironie.

Citation :
"Yes, at the time I thought those thousands of NASA employees were working round the clock for the same incredible goal, but if anyone would know what was really going on, it would be Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said of the 31-year-old part-time librarian's assistant. "He knows a lot more about faked moon landings than I ever could. He's been researching the subject on the Internet for years."

Trad libre: "Je l'admets, à cette époque, je croyais que ces milliers d'employés de la NASA travaillaient 24 heures par jour pour réaliser cette incroyable aventure, mais si quelqu'un peut réellement savoir ce qui s'est réellement passé, c'est certainement Ralph Coleman, cet assistant-libraire à temps partiel de 31 ans. Il en connaît un bail à propos des alunissements fictifs, bien plus que moi encore. Il a fait ses recherches sur internet, depuis des années!!!"
Full sarcastique... Assez drôle même.

Faudrait retrouver l'entrevue réelle donnée par Armstrong pour me convaincre! Very Happy
avatar
Sauf que...
Message le Jeu 03 Sep 2009, 12:26 pm  Axi-Ohm
Une roche lunaire donnée à un ancien premier ministre Hollandais lors d'une visite officielle américaine en octobre 1969 est déclarée fausse...

Citation :
By Toby Sterling, The Associated Press
27 août 2009 - Conspiracy theorists rejoice: Prized 'moon rock' in Dutch national museum is a fake

The Dutch national museum said Thursday that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood.


Rijksmuseum spokeswoman Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation that proved the piece was a fake, said the museum will keep it anyway as a curiosity.


"It's a good story, with some questions that are still unanswered," she said. "We can laugh about it."


The museum acquired the rock after the death of former prime minister Willem Drees in 1988. Drees received it as a private gift on Oct. 9, 1969 from then-U.S. ambassador J. William Middendorf during a visit by the three Apollo 11 astronauts, part of their "Giant Leap" goodwill tour after the first moon landing.


Middendorf, who lives in Rhode Island, told Dutch NOS news that he had gotten it from the U.S. State Department, but couldn't recall the exact details.


The U.S. Embassy in the Hague said it was investigating the matter.


The museum had vetted the moon rock early on by checking with NASA, Van Gelder said.


She said the space agency told the museum then that it was possible the country had received a rock: NASA gave moon rocks to more than 100 countries in the early 1970s, but those were from later missions.


"Apparently no one thought to doubt it, since it came from the prime minister's collection," Van Gelder said.


The rock is not usually on display; the museum is primarily known for its paintings and other works of fine art by masters such as Rembrandt.


It was on show in 2006 and a space expert informed the museum it was unlikely NASA would have given away any moon rocks three months after Apollo returned to Earth.


Researchers from Amsterdam's Free University said they could see at a glance the rock was not from the moon.


"It's a nondescript, pretty-much-worthless stone," Geologist Frank Beunk said in an article published by the museum.


He said it was worth no more than C50 ($70).

SOURCE: CANADIAN PRESS http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090827/koddities/eu_netherlands_not_moon_rock_1
 

Conspirationniste 1 USA zéro - voyage sur la Lune

Voir le sujet précédent Voir le sujet suivant Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
OBSERVONS LA PLANÈTE ! :: OBSERVEZ TOUT TOUT TOUT ! ACTUALITÉS-
Sauter vers: